Search for: "Eli Lilly "
Results 501 - 520
of 2,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-03-18 https://t.co/2dq5TtYhDv -> Here's how the FBI says Russian hackers stole Yahoo account secrets https://t.co/1noTg6N21J -> Appeal Filed in Led Zeppelin ‘Stairway to Heaven’ Copyright Trial https://t.co/xv7845myh0 -> Damages of $52,527.07 for breach of copyright where licence did not pass through foreclosure proceedings https://t.co/lcHjUTdJqN -> Judges Probe FilmOn, Networks on Copyright Issue… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 1:49 am
The first such substance to be approved for therapeutic use was synthetic ‘human’ insulin, developed by Genentech and first marketed by Ely Lilly in 1982. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
I’ve written a lot about these issues in recent weeks: how foreign funding has actually surpassed funding from Canadian broadcasters and distributors for English language TV production why tax schemes for online advertising to support Canadian media won’t work why copyright reform is not the answer for Canadian media how Canadian copyright law is now one of the world’s toughest on piracy why fair dealing in Canada and the shift to digital has been a success story how Canada’s… [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:06 am
Canada won a huge NAFTA victory late last week involving the Canadian patent system, which was challenged by pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-03-20 https://t.co/YQdQcwNoFG -> Alleged set-top box pirates lose Canadian Federal Court appeal https://t.co/fGwuIHXrGy -> 'Free TV' Android box dealers lose court appeal to lift sales ban https://t.co/gUMdoBdRDM -> Filmmaker challenges injunction on Vancouver Aquarium documentary https://t.co/A9arXNX1lQ -> FedEx Can Keep On Copying for Creative Commons Licensee https://t.co/KNvcV0Q7fg -> Form in injunction granted in software… [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:21 am
Eli Lilly and Company et al, 2-15-cv-01202 (TXED March 17, 2017, Order) (Bryson, CJ) [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:05 am
As compensation, Eli Lilly sought at least $500 million in damages. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:59 pm
Eli Lilly &... [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
Eli Lilly and Company et al, 2-15-cv-01202 (TXED March 13, 2017, Order) (Bryson, CJ) [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:39 am
This is painful for the Eli Lilly group, as the patent was one of several elements to protect the successful Cialis® product. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:15 am
Eli Lilly subsequently requested that the Board conduct inter partes review of the patent. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:36 am
Eli Lilly and Company, High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, Patents Court, HC12E02962, 12 February 2016 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:16 am
Eli Lilly and Company et al, 2-15-cv-01202 (TXED March 3, 2017, Order) (Bryson, CJ) [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:59 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:38 am
Referring to its own decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2015] EWCA Civ 555; [2015] Bus LR 1068), the Court took this opportunity to comment on the impossible burden that reliance on prosecution history places on the skilled reader if it were to be recognised as a legitimate aid to construction. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:39 am
Eli Lilly (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:52 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – The matter of Eli Lilly and Company, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:16 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – A patent lawyer for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, Eli Lilly Export S.A. of Geneva, Switzerland and Acrux DDS, Pty Ltd. of West Melbourne, Australia filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
