Search for: "F Walter" Results 501 - 520 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
Im EuR-Beiheft 2-2012 beleuchten fünfzehn namhafte ExpertInnen aus Theorie und Praxis diese neuen Entwicklungen. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:30 pm by Buce
I've been consoling myself these past few nights with what may seem like a recherché taste:The Secret Diary of Harold F. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:04 pm by David Lat
Stengel, James Stengel, Jim Stengel, Management, Managing Partners, Mitchell Zuklie, Musical Chairs, Orrick, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Partner Issues, Ralph Baxter, Walter Brown, Walter F. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:04 pm by David Lat
Stengel, James Stengel, Jim Stengel, Management, Managing Partners, Mitchell Zuklie, Musical Chairs, Orrick, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Partner Issues, Ralph Baxter, Walter Brown, Walter F. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 2:13 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Cohen Distinguished Professor of Law and Taxation, Thomas F. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  He noted that "[f]or months, the Commission had been told that the Staff was recommending that we vote on an interim final rule. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  In support, the Court of Appeals relied on The Hartbridge, 57 F.2d 672 (2d Cir. 1932), a decision by three of the legal giants of that generation (Learned Hand, Augustus Hand, and Thomas Walter Swann), which held: As we understand the statute a motion to confirm puts the other party to his objections. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Chevron Corp., 638 F.3d 384 (2d Cir. 2011), agreement to arbitrate under the UNCITRAL Rules is, given Rule 21, “unmistakable evidence” that the parties intend to submit such questions to the arbitrator. [read post]