Search for: "FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co." Results 501 - 520 of 669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 3:49 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
That may sound like a 'given' but I daresay we are eminently qualified to quantify in that we (PSR) have worked with 10s of thousands of varying workforces over 25 years: e.g., firefighters, paramedics, nurses, law enforcement, utilities, manufacturing, warehouse, freight distribution: 100 cities, 3 federal agencies, fortune 500 companies from Chevron Refineries, and Pacific Gas & Electric Co., to Coca Cola, the Federal Reserve Bank. and Mohawk… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  Similarly, to effectuate broad federal drug regulations, the Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
As explained in the PCAOB report, a reverse merger is an acquisition of a private operating company by a public company shell company. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Read broadly, the decision strikes a blow to the ability of consumers to bring suits against companies, both inside and outside of arbitration. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am by Andrew Spillane
  The Parker Court exempted from federal antitrust scrutiny acts of government and public officials implementing a state law that requires anticompetitive conduct. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Karlsgodt has represented insurance companies and other FORTUNE 500 companies in numerous nationwide and statewide consumer class action lawsuits and related litigation. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
An associated person may include the company's employees, agents, subsidiaries, or any other party that performs services for or on behalf of the company regardless of the "capacity" in which such services are performed. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
 He had been born to wealth and sincerely believed it must be repaid with public service, not money-seeking power. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by LindaMBeale
., high premiums paid only to find delay or denial from health insurance companies, risky casino speculation in derivatives from interconnected banks that lay their losses off on the public while raking in cheap financing provided by the public). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
  Not only that, but since a federal bankruptcy judge still cannot modify a mortgage by lowering payments or extending the term, Claudia had darn fine reason to rely on the bank’s promise to help her reinstate her loan, and provide her with more favorable terms. [read post]