Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 6,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:18 pm
Matter of AJK CafE, Inc. v New York State Liquor Authority In this Article 78 proceeding, Petitioner appealed a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority finding him in violation of 9 NYCRR 48.3 due to employment of an unlicensed security guard. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
I blogged two weeks ago about Hansen v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
Case Background In the case before the Supreme Court, Kucana v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
In Gwiazdowski v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:40 am
K.G. and M.G. lived at Anetta's mother's house since moving to the United States and felt comfortable in their home environment. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:28 pm
I felt very alone. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:29 pm
The deputy also felt Chadwick kicking the deputy several times in the leg. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
However, when convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Sutcliffe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
Muhlenkamp felt he had lost two weeks of time with E.M. prior to her final departure for the United States with Ms. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Against this background, the judge felt that it would be very difficult to draw hard and fast boundaries between ‘zones’ – whether business or familial in nature. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
"Here" = King v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The district court agreed with the State's contention, but felt bound to rule otherwise in light of a case decided in 1980 by this court. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
Big Dipper Entm't, L.L.C. v. [read post]
