Search for: "Falls v. Falls" Results 501 - 520 of 34,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 8:04 am by Dan Ernst
Anthony (LC)The Constitutional Legacy of Seneca Falls, a podcast of the National Constitution Center, is now available. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:23 am by Robert J. Fleming
Judge Doyle, in writing for the Court, cited the seminal premises liability case of Robinson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by John Diekman
Practice point: A defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case has the initial burden of demonstrating, prima facie, that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it.Student note: Once a defendant has actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition, the defendant has a reasonable time to undertake remedial actions that are reasonable and appropriate… [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:54 am by Don Cruse
Opinions A slip-and-fall in a hospital does not qualify as a “health care liability” claim LEZLEA ROSS v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Fall 2010 issue of Competition, the journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, is now out, and it has a number of articles of interest to practitioners in our field: "Outsourcing Justice:  The California Supreme Court's Decision in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 pm by ADeStefano
In McCrea v Arnlie Realty Co., the First Department held that an injured elevator repairman was entitled to recovery under Labor Law § 240 as an elevator is considered a “falling object” within the meaning of the Labor Law. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 pm by ADeStefano
In McCrea v Arnlie Realty Co., the First Department held that an injured elevator repairman was entitled to recovery under Labor Law § 240 as an elevator is considered a “falling object” within the meaning of the Labor Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
Carol Sanger, Columbia Law School, has published The Rise and Fall of a Reproductive Right: Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:15 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Lerner (George Mason University School of Law) has posted Sentenced to Confusion: Miller v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 6:03 pm by APransky
This results in a trap for the parent who reduces or stops paying child support.In the case of Taylor v. [read post]