Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Levin, 16-492 Issue: Whether bankruptcy courts should apply a federal rule of decision (as five circuits have held) or a state-law rule of decision (as two circuits have held, expressly acknowledging a split of authority) when deciding to recharacterize a debt claim in bankruptcy as a capital contribution. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:49 pm
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
Levin, 2016 WL 2596010 (U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
Levine. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:22 am
Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:28 am
Levine and PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Last month, in Riegel v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:35 am
Levin. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
Levine. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
"For the state of Texas to appoint a lawyer who they then removed from the list — who was being taken to task in a federal court at the very same time he's being appointed to represent Bobby in his federal proceedings, and then for Bobby — a mentally retarded man — to suffer the consequences of that appointment is atrocious. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:33 pm
(7) Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court concluded in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 10:25 pm
[British Columbia Teachers’ Federation v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Claeys Ricci v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:54 pm
Levine was a landmark decision for federal preemption and specifically defective drug litigation. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:01 am
Levine, which is to be heard November 3. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:51 am
Levine. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Supreme Court agreed to take the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:15 pm
On February 20, in the Riegel v. [read post]
