Search for: "Fee v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 6,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
He also sought to represent a class of “[a]ll customers in the United States who … incurred an overdraft fee as a result of the bank’s practice of resequencing debit card transactions from highest to lowest. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:53 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The case was voluntarily dismissed by LHO and after being denied their Lanham Act attorney fees, the Defendants appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:35 am
The United States District Court for Maryland recently granted summary judgment in a case upholding a covenant not to compete involving a former Director of Strategic Accounts for TEKsystems, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm by Mack Sperling
The Business Court found further light shed on the term "substantial benefit" by looking to the Model Business Corporation Act, which references in a comment the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of similar language in MBCA §7.46(1). [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am by David Oscar Markus
But the case brings the most direct legal challenge in the United States to the clout that Apple has built up through its App Store. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am by Holly
January 5, 2023  |  By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:25 pm by Ronald Mann
  Three years ago, the Court held by a vote of six to three that the “first sale” doctrine of copyright law made it lawful for Kirtsaeng to resell foreign-made books in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Dudas, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office (07-1504), the U.S. [read post]