Search for: "Flood v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 2,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm by Ryke Longest
A devastating flood on the Republican River in 1935 hastened along state and federal planning to create both flood control and irrigation projects. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by Joseph Tartakovsky
Some may wonder if the threatened flooding and burden on states isn’t already underway from the creation of the initial exception for ineffective trial-court assistance (in a case called Martinez v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:34 pm
In February, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Davis, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by Clara Spera
As Tara pointed out yesterday, the Supreme Court delivered a huge victory to privacy groups in its Riley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Lea Valley area was not part of the plan, being instead part of a flood risk area and to be developed for the regional park and to lessen flood risk. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Lea Valley area was not part of the plan, being instead part of a flood risk area and to be developed for the regional park and to lessen flood risk. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:18 am by Ronald Mann
They allege a scheme in which State Farm fraudulently misclassified losses from wind damage (payable under State Farm’s own policies) as losses from flood damage (payable by the government under the federal flood-insurance program). [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:00 pm
The case is Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Control Authority - East v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 10:58 am by Robert Laplaca
The ramifications of this landmark decision could open up the flood gates for states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]