Search for: "Frank Petition" Results 501 - 520 of 1,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 10:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Defendant Frank’s declaration indicated his personal responsibility for the restaurant’s acts: “In the exercise of my constitutionally protected right of petition and free speech, my restaurant, La Toque, is protesting the law, not breaking it, by giving away foie gras to customers I choose to give it to. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:18 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  In opposing the petition for certiorari filed by State National Bank of Big Spring (which the Supreme Court denied), the DOJ argued that while it agreed with the bank that the CFPB’s structure is unconstitutional and the proper remedy would be to sever the Dodd-Frank for-cause removal provision, the case was a poor vehicle for deciding the constitutionality issue. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:11 am by Joe Consumer
If you do nothing else to honor Law Day today, sign Public Citizen's petition! [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm by Stephen Knaster
  In May, while the July 2014 AMI decision was still pending, the SEC petitioned for rehearing of the NAM decision on the First Amendment disclosure issue, but requested that the Court hold the petition in abeyance pending issuance of the en banc AMI decision. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In a very unusual recent law review essay, University of Chicago (emeritus) law Professor Al Alschuler seeks to expose what he sees as judicial wrongdoing by Frank Easterbrook, a prominent judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (who came to the bench after a prolific career as a law professor and legal scholar, also at the University of Chicago.) [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
  When Maxwell filed a state habeas petition, the California Supreme Court sent the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Dianne Saxe
We thus dismiss for lack of jurisdiction all petitions for review of the Timing and Tailoring Rules, and deny the remainder of the petitions. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
" "Judge Thomson, who heard arguments on the petition Thursday, agreed with Lackawanna's position and disqualified the firm as Luzerne's counsel. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:51 am by Patricia Salkin
They subsequently amended their pleadings and, in April 2018, served the owners with an amended petition/complaint. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
If the prosecutors in that case are successful and win reinstatement of the death sentence imposed on Frank G. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:48 am by Layma Ahmadzai
Wal-Mart’s filing of a cert. petition in a massive gender discrimination case dominates today’s headlines. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum
The Dodd-Frank Act provides that such a petition must be filed “not later than 10 days” after a regulation has been published in the Federal Register. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
To remedy the constitutional defect, the court severed the removal-only-for-cause provision from the Dodd-Frank Act so that the President “now has the power to supervise and direct the Director of the CFPB, and may remove the Director at will at any time. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 12:15 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  In opposing the petition for certiorari filed by State National Bank of Big Spring (which the Supreme Court denied this week), DOJ argued that while it agreed with the bank that the CFPB’s structure is unconstitutional and the proper remedy would be to sever the Dodd-Frank Act’s for-cause removal provision, the case was a poor vehicle for deciding the constitutionality issue. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The SG's] petition, filed Nov. 14, makes a remarkable claim: that the CFPB's self-funding power is constitutional because Dodd-Frank itself satisfies the Constitution's requirement. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 7:55 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
” Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Section 1054(e), the CFPB would need the DOJ’s consent to represent itself in the Supreme Court in Seila Law. [read post]