Search for: "Franks v. Delaware"
Results 501 - 520
of 610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am
There is no particular SEC rule on this issue, but it is instead based on the holding in cases like FTC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
”) (citing Franks v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am
Deal v Tugalo Gas Co. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 3 2, 41 (2000); Delaware v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Frank D., 858 N.Y.S.2d 864 (Queens County Family Court 2008). [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:34 am
” Public companies also face additional rules, notably those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2012 and the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Moreover, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo Strine has published a paper that also urges super majority voting by shareholders. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Musa Subasi (University of Maryland, College Park), on Sunday, April 1, 2018 Tags: Board communication, Boards of Directors, Decision making, Executive performance, Firm performance, Information environment, Management, Signaling, Social networks, Stock performance Disclosing Corporate Lobbying Posted by Timothy Smith, Walden Asset Management, and John Keenan, AFSCME, on Monday, April 2, 2018 … [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:27 am
In its July 9, 2012 opinion, written by Chief Judge Frank H. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” Delaware: Scott Holt, on the Delaware Non-Compete Blog (Settlement Discussions Not An Excuse for Delayed TRO Application To Enforce Noncompete), discusses a recent Delaware Chancery Court case highlighting the need to move quickly to seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:43 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm
Braden, decided today by the Tennessee Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Frank G. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:36 am
(In Franks v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:38 pm
Fortunately, Lull’s attorney learned of this $20 informant theft omission from the search warrant application, got a Franks hearing (under Franks v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:03 pm
Zazi or any target of intercepted calls had a privacy interest and was subjected to electronic surveillance was being used or was about to be used by a “foreign power” or an “agent of a foreign power; The last allegation is: The FISC application papers contain false statements, recklessly made, in violation of Franks v, Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
As discussed further below, because of the hostility of the Delaware Court of Chancery to the disclosure-only settlements that frequently resolve these kinds of cases, the plaintiffs’ lawyers are filing these suits in federal court. [read post]
