Search for: "G.L. " Results 501 - 520 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 1:19 pm by Naomi Shatz
Klemm, 446 Mass. 572, 578 (2006) the Court noted: “General Laws c. 214, § 1C, thus extends to employees and students protection that is not otherwise available under G.L. c. 151B and c. 151C; it does not duplicate the relief provided by those statutes. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
G.L c. 231, § 60H puts a cap of $500,000 on medical malpractice awards when it comes to pain and suffering, loss of companionship and other general damages. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:39 pm by justinsilverman
Had he done so, his recording would not have been secret, and so would not have violated G.L. c. 272 § 99.” Id. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:27 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The court found that this was a violation of G.L. c. 138, Section 69 (discussed above), as the bar owners knew or should have known they were serving intoxicated persons. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:01 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
G.L. c. 156D § 14.30, which provides for involuntary dissolution on petition of at least 40 percent of the combined voting power of all shares if the directors or shareholders are deadlocked. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:35 am by Michael DelSignore
The SJC, however, cited to a Massachusetts statute (G.L. c. 276, § 1) that was enacted to provide more protection against searches and seizures then does the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
As we discussed in that resource page, Massachusetts G.L. c. 231 Section 60B, establishes the requirement for a tribunal for malpractice cases against healthcare providers. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:43 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Instead, the employer’s “self-insured” status is one created by G.L. c. 152 section 25A , and the self-insurer is in fact regulated by the department. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:53 am by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
 76 would amend G.L. c. 272, § 107(b) and would make it a crime to knowingly distribute visual material where:  The material depicts an identifiable person who is nude, partially nude, or engaged in sexual conduct;   The distribution would cause a reasonable person to suffer harm;  The defendant distributes the material with an intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce the victim or distributes the… [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:24 pm by Justin Silverman
Had he done so, his recording would not have been secret, and so would not have violated G.L. c. 272 § 99. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
Under that framework, the defendant assert[ed] that, to provide constitutionally effective assistance, counsel must warn clients about consequences of sex offender registration when they are considering whether to plead guilty to a ‘sex offense’ as defined in G.L. c.6, §178C. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Heidi A. Nadel
ShaveLogic counterclaimed, alleging that Gillette filed its lawsuit in bad faith.Gillette moved to dismiss, arguing that its filing of the lawsuit was petitioning activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, G.L. c. 231, section 59H, and was protected by the litigation privilege. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am by The Charge
  The Supreme Judicial Court stated, Were the defendant serving a sentence in a correctional institution in this Commonwealth he would, both under art. 11 and by statute (see G.L. c. 277, § 72A, inserted by St.1963, c. 486), have the right, if he requested it, to a prompt trial on the pending indictments. [read post]