Search for: "GARNER v. STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 1,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 8:39 am
Both of these types of “Amazon” laws have garnered significant criticism and constitutional challenges. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
Another possibility is that the eponymous doctrine of desuetude, or some version thereof, might prevent their enforcement, especially given that such pre-Roe laws in many cases would not garner a majority of the present-day legislatures in the states where they exist. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice… [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Hannah Rosborough
Anecdotally, the revision that seems to have garnered notable attention is Jurisprudence Rule 3.1: Hierarchy of sources. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:21 am
Nine West Development Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:13 am
  As detailed here at SCOTUSblog, Tuesday afternoon the Supreme Court will hear argument in Oregon v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:31 am
Kindler (08-992) - enforcement of state procedural rule in federal habeas Wed., Nov. 4: Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Conor McEvily
This blog’s online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
In a new and interesting working paper, Ilya Somin (George Mason) examines the political backlash against the Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am by Jeff Welty
Garner, 331 N.C. 491 (1992) (stating that the two constitutions protect the “same fundamental right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures”); State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:42 pm by Carl Neff
  This exception is known as the “Garner Doctrine”, established in the 5th Circuit decision of Garner v. [read post]