Search for: "Gans" Results 501 - 520 of 1,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 6:07 am
Gans has an essay titled "A Term to Remember: The Supreme Court gave us a historic year for liberty and equality. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
  Writing for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro discusses the relationship between the Justices in the face of strong dissents like last week’s, while in commentary for the New Republic David Gans explains why this year was a “term to remember” and at Slate’s Breakfast Table Judge Richard Posner suggests that “a chief justice has a greater personal interest in how he votes than the other justices. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans notes that, since the advent of the Roberts Court, “almost every Term has featured a major election law case coming by direct appeal” and “more are on their way,” which is “why it is significant that the Supreme Court . . . agreed to hear Shapiro v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Gans argues it reflects "a long term conservative strategy for getting blockbuster campaign finance and voting rights cases to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:40 am by David Gans
Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:49 pm by John P. Feldman
Gans said he trusted Uber to take his kids from place to place, but not the Toronto taxi system. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:49 pm by John P. Feldman
Gans said he trusted Uber to take his kids from place to place, but not the Toronto taxi system. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
” The Constitutional Accountability Center continues its series on the Roberts Court in its tenth Term with a post from David Gans on the Court’s First Amendment’s jurisprudence. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:31 pm by Joe Patrice
[The American Lawyer] * David Gans on the upcoming "one person, one vote" claim. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:44 pm
Gans has this report online today at the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
”  Commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, where he suggests that the Court’s decision “will affect the nature of American democracy for generations to come”; from Seth Lipsky, who in the New York Post similarly suggests that the case could “ignite an earthquake in American politics”; from Joey Fishkin, who at Balkinization argues that the case “comes at the law in a kind of funhouse-mirror reverse, aiming to destroy in Equal… [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:58 am
Este año, DirecTV fue la única PSI que ganó una estrella completa por publicar su política de protección de datos de forma clara y accesible al público. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Marty Lederman
Following up on the recent posts by Joey Fishkin and David Gans on the Evenwel case that the Court has decided to hear, I thought it might be worth posting the argument made by the United States the last time this issue reached the Court, in the government's brief in opposition to certiorari in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:50 am by David Gans
   David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:01 pm by Douglas Marques
Santo Ivo assumiu a causa dos humildes e dos pequeninos, defendendo-os contra a ganância e a exploração, desmascarava a mentira, defendia os inocentes, condenava os criminosos. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:41 am by Gustavo Arballo
Estamos ciertos de que si un equipo dopa a todos sus jugadores para que tengan rendimientos excepcionales no podría alegar que "ganó en la cancha", y lo mismo funciona si un equipo hace algo que afecte la salud de los jugadores rivales, como darle un laxante en un bidón. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:11 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Un abogado ganó la pasada semana una demanda contra la ciudad de Alexandria en el estado de Virginia por haberle prohibido colocar unos carteles de “Se vende” en dos de sus autos y haberlos estacionado en las calles de la ciudad, según se divulgara por medio de un comunicado de prensa de su representación legal. [read post]