Search for: "Gills v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
” Jeff Gill of the Gainesville Times reports the latest developments in a water dispute among Georgia, Florida, and Alabama; the latter two states are expected to seek Supreme Court review of the dispute. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:18 am
" Gilles v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
(This claim was rejected in Gill, however.) [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:24 am
Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:08 am
Morrison Much has been written about two recent decisions, one striking down the section of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that denies federal benefits to same sex couples, who are legally married under the laws of their state, that are available to opposite sex married couples (Gill v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The article was written by Partners Mary Gill and Robert Long and Associate Todd Chatham. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
Kat friend Ian Gill reports on how miniscule trademark use may be enough to support a passing off claim and maintain a EU trademark registration. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:06 pm
Gill,[1973] S.C.R. 654, Hayre v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:30 am
For example, in Gill v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:38 am
Rares J delivered his judgment last week: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34 . [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In Gill v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:09 pm
Danning, Gill, Diamond & Kollitz (2009) 178 Cal. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:28 pm
Further, the United States Supreme Court reminded us again in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:12 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court reminded us again in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
City of New York, New York and United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am
United States, 16-9649, Richter v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
This Consultation on the new draft rules and the extent of reform required was postponed awaiting the recent first instance and appeal decisions in the Court of Session in the case of Application of BBC Scotland re A v Secretary State for the Home Department at [2012] CSOH 185 and [2012] CSIH 43 respectively. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
See Gill v. [read post]
