Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Thus, on August 15, 2014, PhRMA filed an amicus curiae brief in Solis in support of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the conduct in question was protected by the First Amendment, and therefore could not be the subject of an FCA (or any other type of) action.PhRMA first placed Solissolely in the constitutional cross-hairs as a case alleging that the distribution of published, peer-reviewed scientific arguments could not possibly involve anything… [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:00 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:15 am
"The evidence that forms the basis of L-3's allegations are apparently detailed in 12 pleadings and more than 100 exhibits, including the defendant's initial motion to dismiss the case and Lockheed's response, that have all been filed under seal.The only information available to the public as to why Pannell ultimately overturned the $37 million verdict is in his 8-page order issued this week.On Thursday, however, the judge issued another order saying that he had… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:07 pm
Within 7 days after a response is filed any party may, but need not, file and serve a reply to the statement of reasons set forth in the response. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Despite the powerful opposition to the bills, both are still alive as of today, January 18, 2012. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Despite the powerful opposition to the bills, both are still alive as of today, January 18, 2012. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm
The notion of a "tradition" is the opposite of one-offs, outliers, or novel enactments. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
The Government’s Marathon Defense After about an hour of oral argument by two ACLU lawyers, Assistant Attorney General Stuart Delery rises to present the government’s opposition to the preliminary injunction bid, and arguments in favor of the United States’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:53 am
Heath signed the declaration on October 29, 2014; the Judge granted al Iraqi’s motion a week later. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari (1121) Conditional cross-petition (1295) Brief in opposition (1121) Response to conditional cross-petition (1295) Petitioners’ reply (1121) Reply for cross-petitioners (1295) Title: Morgan v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
District) Statement as to jurisdiction Motion to affirm filed by appellee Michael B. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:05 pm
The court granted the motion. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Eltiar's Motion for Withdrawal as Counsel (ECF No. 18), filed April 28, 2017; Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff Wilfred Omoloh's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Injunction and Addendum Thereto (ECF No. 19), filed May 3, 2017; and Defendant's Response and Objection to Asem Z. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Section 402(c)(3) provides private entities an opportunity to comment in writing in response to the government’s actions. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Opinions below (9th Circuit): Denial of motion to vacate; opinion Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondent Independent Living Center Brief in opposition of respondents Sacramento Family Medical Clinics et al. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
Judge Posner also directed the Clerk to circulate to the en banc court defendants’ opposition to the motion to file a reply, which defends the panel’s opinion, Dkt. 43 (May 28, 2014), though none of the other motion papers were circulated, including Motorola’s motion to file a reply, the initial order denying leave to file a reply, and Motorola’s request for en banc consideration of its motion. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:45 am
This paragraph of the motion is a response to Durham’s allegation that Sussmann concealed and failed to disclose, (i) SUSSMANN had spent time drafting one of the white papers he provided to the FBI General Counsel and billed that time to the Clinton Campaign, and (ii) the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
The process of defending these suits is time consuming, messy, and diverts critical intelligence community resources away from their responsibility of protecting U.S. national security interests. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
The issue isn’t government opposition to unfettered monitoring. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
Not shrinking from the fight, California AG Becerra filed a formal opposition to the request for preliminary injunction, a motion to dismiss the suit, and a legal brief. [read post]
