Search for: "Governmental Employees Insurance Company"
Results 501 - 520
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 9:57 am
Department of Health and Human Services, often called the “contraceptives mandate,” under which companies are required to provide their employees with health insurance that covers a broad array of contraceptives, including some that allegedly may function as abortifacients. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 9:57 am
Department of Health and Human Services, often called the “contraceptives mandate,” under which companies are required to provide their employees with health insurance that covers a broad array of contraceptives, including some that allegedly may function as abortifacients. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
Is the Case About Insurance Coverage of “Abortifacients”? [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
A similar regime, though more flexible, is a foundation of limited liability companies. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
For the time being Folketrygdfondet has 45 employees. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
Since then, the company has grown into a leader in the arts-and-crafts retail industry, with 588 stores and around 13,000 employees across the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
Furthermore, while a religious institution has a broad immunity from being required to engage in acts that violate the tenets of its faith, it has no right to prevent other institutions, whether the government or a health insurance company, from engaging in acts that merely offend the institution..If the government is entitled to require that female contraceptives be provided to women free of charge, we have trouble understanding how signing the form that declares… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Her claim was dismissed as to the state and its employees based on concepts of governmental immunity, as discussed above. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am
The Hobby Lobby companies assert that the coverage of certain services in an employer-provided health insurance policy will implicate their owners and them in the termination of pre-natal human life. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
And that turns out to be a very complex question, one that might well turn on whether federal law imposes substantial pressure on the company directors to choose to retain their employee health insurance plans. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
This approach will often continue to overlook different types of leakage that is not on the company’s radar. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 am
The report shows that the D&O claimants include not only shareholders or other owners but also vendors, competitors, employees, suppliers, regulators and governmental authorities, as well as others. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 am
The report shows that the D&O claimants include not only shareholders or other owners but also vendors, competitors, employees, suppliers, regulators and governmental authorities, as well as others. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
HHS has exempted churches and their auxiliaries from the requirement to include contraception if they offer an employee health insurance plan. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
The Pay or Play Rules require employers with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees to offer affordable and adequate health insurance or pay a penalty.For more information about the Pay or Play Rules, see von Briesen’s legal update [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
The Pay or Play Rules require employers with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees to offer affordable and adequate health insurance or pay a penalty.For more information about the Pay or Play Rules, see von Briesen’s legal update [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Public company D&O insurers have long considered that their significant severity exposure to be limited to securities class action lawsuits. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
If a religious nonprofit organization opts out, the insurance company that issues the policy to the employer, or the third-party administrator that administers its self-insured group health plan, generally must assume responsibility for contraceptive coverage and provide or arrange separate payments to employees for contraceptive services. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 am
Attorney Nagi has successfully represented private and public companies in numerous industries, including franchises, hotels, banks, financial service corporations, insurance companies, luxury retailers, restaurant chains, and auto dealerships. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
” The plaintiffs’ theory is that by requiring the companies to offer their employees access to a health insurance plan that guarantees coverage without cost-sharing for certain forms of contraception, the HHS Rule allegedly forces the individuals who own and operate such companies to “participate in,” pay for and “support” their employees’ use of “abortion-causing drugs and devices” (quoting… [read post]
