Search for: "Grant v. Arkansas Supreme Court"
Results 501 - 520
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
” The Florida Supreme Court, 5-2, in Kirk Douglas Williams v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
The Court denied cert. in Marek v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:58 am
The other Entergy plaintiffs include rate-regulated utilities and rate-regulated producers that supply electricity and gas to customers in Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, and Arkansas. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Dixon, 10-1540, which the state also claims disregarded various Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
The Supreme Court has identified an intelligible principle as falling into either of the "two buckets" identified in Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
The 1986 regulations were the subject of three Supreme Court decisions, the most recent of which was Rapanos v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
The 1986 regulations were the subject of three Supreme Court decisions, the most recent of which was Rapanos v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
The 1986 regulations were the subject of three Supreme Court decisions, the most recent of which was Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
” In the last of the four favorable decisions, the Arkansas Supreme Court ordered a new penalty phase proceeding in James Aaron Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 7:38 am
" Both the United States Supreme Court and the Eighth Circuit have recognized claims for "retaliatory inducement to prosecute. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
If this case is granted, it may be the first time in the court’s history that its plenary docket features two website names in case captions. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
Supreme Court has long debated the question with sharply different views. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Jones Subsequently, the shareholders petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm
LEXIS 30 (AZ 7/12/2010) Despite striking the (F)(3) aggravator, the Arizona Supreme Court has affirmed the conviction [h/t Arizona Capital Representation Project] People v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:15 am
Years later, that Supreme Court decision, Korematsu v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
LEXIS 9679 (10th Cir 5/12/2010) Relief granted as the trial court, under Beck v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Trucios-Haynes observed in the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal that applying the Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence to long-standing immigration laws “is particularly awkward. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 5:52 pm
Consider the leading Supreme Court case on the takings clause, Kelo v. [read post]
