Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2010, 10:00 am
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, 2010 U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
Our amicus brief urges the Federal Circuit to grant en banc review in Ariosa v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
Thus, the Supreme Court was correct in denying his the petition, and properly dismissed the proceeding [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
And in the recent opinion of the Second Department, Appellate Division, you would be correct in doing so. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:50 pm
MA (Somalia) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 49. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
This case involves the Michigan Department of Corrections' (MDOC) release of several corrections officers' social security numbers and birth dates to prisoners held at the Ionia Maximum Security Correctional Facility (IMAX), which houses male prisoners 07a0292p.06 2007/08/02 O'Neill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
In Abou-Haidar, v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:19 pm
Read the whole case, Caro v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 9:25 am
Facts: This case (Sloan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:46 am
Facts: This case (RAINSBERGER v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:58 am
Mujwid v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
” On Monday, the Supreme Court granted review in Vidal v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
The court can simply grant certiorari and reverse the 5th Circuit’s decision without briefing and oral argument, a streamlined procedure that the court has used in the past when a lower court has so clearly departed from binding precedent. * * * Past cases linked to in this post: Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:02 am
Then, for the balance of that, the person is still supervised by the Department of Corrections. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
The case is Gjuraj v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
” Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
” Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
’” (Quoting Dura Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
