Search for: "Grant v. Scott"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
In the case of Scott-Moncieff v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:23 pm
Strut's motion to dismiss and grant GEICO's preliminary injunction application. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 11:06 am
In the case of Chilutti v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:31 am
Green Tree Servicing, LLC, 366 F.3d 1249, 1253 (11th Cir.2004) (automatic divestiture of trial court jurisdiction unless appeal is frivolous); Bradford-Scott Data Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 10:56 am
On Aug. 1, the Western District granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to limit plaintiff’s damages expert testimony in Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Edmonton, the Court of Appeal of Alberta granted the Crown leave to appeal the acquittal of Jarrod Scott Edmonton on a drinking and driving offence. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:06 am
Scott, [Ms. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
Tabiu v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Against the back drop of Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 7:45 pm
Perkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:59 am
The Constitution demands better [Ilya Shapiro on Cato Institute cert amicus brief in Copeland v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
I previously wrote about the case at the time certiorari was granted. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
In Mendez v May, 2015 WL 143965 (D. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's grant of Summary Judgment in James v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:19 am
In the 1864 case of Gelpke v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Critics sometimes analogize Roe to Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Scott replied. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion, Duran v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:18 pm
The Court also granted reconsideration of its December 3, 2008 order in Scott v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
Unfortunately, there is little likelihood of a change being made to the "universally applied standard" in view of the CAFC's reluctance to consider interlocutory appeals of stay grants in the absence of "irreparable consequences," as shown last Friday by the Court's dismissal of such an appeal in Sorensen v. [read post]
