Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 28,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 2:42 pm by Marilyn Wesel
District Court granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
”  If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:19 am by Unknown
" The panel accordingly granted a motion to vacate the rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm by NARF
Colville Confederated Tribes (Time Served; Due Process and Equal Protection Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Ronan F. v. [read post]
Granted, the police who responded to the May and September reports about Card’s behavior did not have the benefit of hindsight that those who are now reviewing events enjoy. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by David Lynn
United States, 50 F.4th 498, 529 (5th Cir. 2022) (citation omitted). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
Case date: 05 December 2023 Case number: No. 22-1006 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]