Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
In addition, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP filed a BRIEF FOR 181 MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS AMICI... [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
R(N) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 799 (Admin) (26 February 2015) [Not on Bailii, we’ve seen a transcript.] [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
In giving the only judgment Lady Hale stated that no enquiries were made to assess the practicability of moving the family to Bletchley or as to the children’s needs, subject to the Children’s Act 2004, s 11(2). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:46 am
The lawfulness of the cap was addressed by the Supreme Court in R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
See Hale v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
The more recent development of that approach by Hale LJ in Eagle v Chambers [2003] EWCA Civ was also cited approvingly by the Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:52 am
Lady Hale, giving the leading judgment, stated that the respondent’s general manager should not simply have accepted the view of the inquiry that suicide was the most likely explanation for Mr Braganza’s disappearance. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
Lady Hale, dissenting, stated that what has to be considered is whether the benefit cap as it applies to lone parents can be justified independently of its discriminatory effects. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Judgment was handed down in respect of this subsequent hearing on 23 July 2014 in Coventry and others (Respondents) v Lawrence and another (Appellants) (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Lady Hale at [99] noted that whilst the court would not always take the government’s word for it, foreign policy and national security were government business. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
In holding that “continuous and systematic contacts” alone are insufficient to establish general jurisdiction, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that a company could be haled into court merely for “doing business” in a state. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
Lady Hale agreed with the majority, but noted that since Mr Catt has not been and is not likely to be involved in criminal activity, it would have been disproportionate to keep a nominal record about him. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
Lady Hale supported Lord Kerr’s analysis. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:12 pm
Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. (1959); United States v. [read post]
