Search for: "HALLIBURTON COMPANY"
Results 501 - 520
of 820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 4:08 am
Halliburton. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:37 am
Earlier in the term, the Court had ruled favorably to plaintiffs in the Matrixx Initiatives case (refer here) and more recently in the Halliburton case (refer here). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
Halliburton Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Halliburton Co., et al. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
EPJ Fund alleges that Halliburton made various misrepresentations designed to inflate the company’s stock price, in violation of §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b–5. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
And the decision will be heralded as the third opinion this term favoring securities class action plaintiffs (Matrixx and Halliburton are the other two). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In this post, Tom Gorman discusses the speech and the importance of maintaining credibility. 4) Conglomerate: Geithner and the Race to the Bottom in Financial Regulation – One of the many criticisms of the Dodd-Frank Act is that it will drive companies out of the U.S. and into the arms of friendlier regulators. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:10 am
It is legal for a company to unilaterally ban customers from court and eliminate the possibility of a class action.read more [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
The issue arose because a Stanford employee, Mark Holodniy, regularly visited biotech company Cetus (now Roche) to observe its work. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:05 am
The Petitioner, EPJ, filed a securities fraud class action against Halliburton, alleging that the company deliberately “made various misrepresentations designed to inflate its stock price” in violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
Your Company Firewalls Are Meaningless to Your Employees. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
Halliburton, the Court unanimously held that to obtain class certification, securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove loss causation. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:00 am
And click here to read a recent Law Blog interview with Bill Lerach in which he discussed the significance of the Halliburton case. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:53 am
Background As detailed here, in 2002, shareholders had filed a securities class action lawsuit against Halliburton and certain of its directors and officers, alleging that the company has misrepresented certain aspects of its financial condition, including the company’s exposure to potential liability from asbestos litigation and the company’s expected revenue from certain construction contracts. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:05 am
Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
Halliburton Co., et al., Dkt. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
The process of high-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing, or "hydrofracking," was first used commercially by Halliburton in 1949. [read post]
SOLAR . . . or So Not?!? SOLAR is a Popular Mark; do any of These Uses Violate the FTC Green Guides?
2 Jun 2011, 11:21 pm
Apparently, Google does too, as these are the images that the search engine provides when one puts the search term “solar” into Google Images: I wonder how many, if any, companies tried to register the word SOLAR all by itself for solar related goods or services. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:05 am
The challenge is to manage the renewable energy technologies in a manner in which the entrant and innovative firms can absorb market share from the fossil fuel based global energy giants – which are some of the richest companies in the world including BP, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Halliburton, etc. [read post]
