Search for: "HAWKINS v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2007, 4:32 am
US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:05 am
US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 2:34 am
US v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
Charles Hawkins, No. 96,250 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; Felony DUIShawn E. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
The 9th (Hawkins joined by Tallman and Bea) held that such a culmination of errors was not harmless, and under Chambers v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
United States, 336 U.S. 440 (1949) (holding that, in a close case, erroneously admitted evidence -- even if cumulative of other evidence -- can 'tip the scales' against the defendant) and Hawkins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 8:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1:1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
The 9th (Hawkins joined by Thomas and Bea) affirm a denial of a petition in a capital case. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:25 pm
Norington v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:28 am
Siegel draws on this history to illuminate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissenting opinion in "Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:34 pm
And both Judge Hawkins and Judge Ferguson write opinions worth reading in this regard. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:48 am
US v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:43 pm
Judge Hawkins also probed the government about state secrets, noting that Judge Walker had already reviewed all of the information and determined that state secrets did not preclude the case from continuing. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 9:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:29 am
" See United States v Larson, __ F.3d. __, 2007 WL 2192256 (9th Cir. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:58 pm
Hawkins, No. 95,310, which will test whether State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
J. 389***Christopher V. [read post]
