Search for: "HOLDING v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 69,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
We hold that such speech is attributable to the State only if the official (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the State’s behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when he spoke on social media Some problems: First, the court talks about attributing “speech” to the government, when the actual issue is whether an accountholder’s account blocks or content removal constitute an impermissible restriction on third-party speech. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:39 pm
Campers, some holding lumber and wearing goggles and helmets, rallied to defend the site’s perimeter. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:33 am
Over 30 states and dozens of localities have adopted the IHRA definition. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:48 am
" United States v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:30 am
OCR noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
SnapRays, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Susan V. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
The felon cannot own or possess a firearm, vote in elections, hold public office, or join the military. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
Stated that way, Section 230’s applicability is obvious. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:35 am
The court relied on In re Estate of Jurgens, 31 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1948) and Noe v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am
United States v. [read post]