Search for: "Ha v. U.S. Department of Justice et al" Results 501 - 520 of 833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of the United States Brief in opposition of respondents Thompson et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
The Internet Association, SIIA et al. brief contains an interesting explanation of how "article of manufacture" must be interpreted differently from a "machine. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am by Jihee Ahn
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991), but advised that its grant of authority for that particular deposition should not be considered precedent, and China has not permitted a deposition since. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Department of Health and Human Services and Drug Enforcement Administration The “Clearly Releasable,” Clearly Nonsense Award: U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General in March 2010, when the Justice Department filed a brief in this case in the Fifth Circuit Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
In the field portion of the boating study, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Police administered the four SBST candidate measures. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
A check of the Clerk's docket shows that "Case Number: 45 A 05 - 0612 - CV - 00754, SMITH AND WESSON ET AL. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court nevertheless granted the case. ** In Hall, et al., v . [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The judge, however, cleared the way for the Justice Department to take that specific issue to the D.C. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:27 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Moreover, Padilla’s claims against Rumsfeld et al. may fall on more sympathetic ears in the Fourth Circuit, which narrowly divided on the legality of domestic military detention in the al-Marri litigation and issued a blistering rebuke to government for its handling of Padilla’s habeas case. [read post]