Search for: "Hague v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2010, 8:04 am
But where EU law is engaged, the Charter could be directly enforceable in national law, as was demonstrated by a decision earlier this year in the Court of Appeal: see our post on the as yet unreported R (on the application of S) (Claimant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Defendant) & (1) Amnesty International & AIRE Centre (2) United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Interveners) (2010). [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:22 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:41 am
Prior to the Child’s first visit to the United States the parties obtained a United States passport and United States citizenship for the Child. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
The following Declaration was then adopted: On 23-25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross-border family… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 1:58 pm
In Lozano v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
20 Nov 2012, 8:20 am
In Estrada v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am
Petitioner would have incurred the costs of feeding, clothing and otherwise supporting his children and himself whether his children were in the United States or Germany. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
Facebook argued in its filings that Faceporn targets a United States audience by using a ".com" address, and by virtue of the fact that Faceporn is an interactive website with 250 users in California and 1000 users in the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:00 am
While federal law incorporates state law on service of process when the defendant is to be served in a judicial district of the United States, it does not incorporate state law when the defendant is to be served abroad. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 2:10 pm
Defendant objected that only one of the deponents possessed potentially relevant information and argued that the depositions, if any, should take place in London according to the procedural requirements of the Hague Convention (or, if in the United States, at least in New York instead of Hartford). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:41 pm
In Abbott v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
One of the four widows, Esther Kiobel had brought a suit against Shell in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
See United States Football League, 887 F.2d 408, 416 (2d Cir.1989); Kuzma v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 7:50 am
In 1989, China permitted a limited deposition in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:19 am
In Felder v. [read post]
