Search for: "Harm v. Lake-Harm" Results 501 - 520 of 1,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In other words, because the harm was going to occur anyway, the government can't be liable for a taking when it decides who is going to get harmed. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Robyn Doolittle of The Globe describes the story of a Toronto schoolteacher who slipped and fell into Lake Ontario, tragically dying as a result. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Unlike other excise taxes, rental car excise taxes are not imposed to reduce a harm or ensure drivers are paying for infrastructure. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am by Pace Law Library
Reasonable bases for apportioning harm under CERCLA. 37 Ecology L.Q. 317-352 (2010).Schreck, Addison J. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]