Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am
However, already in Boehringer Ingelheim v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am
” It went on to say that the ostinatos in both songs are identical, both ostinatos are nearly identical in pitch content and melodic contour as is the mechanical style, and that the timbre of the upper and primary voice are remarkably similar.However, the Defendants relied on the report of their own musicology expert who opined that “‘Dark Horse’ does not share any significant structural, harmonic, rhythmic, melodic, or lyrical similarities, individually or in… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
[On a side note, comparing this to the Sheeran v Switch case - Switch went for varying degrees of both approaches in that they argued the two had mutual friends and that the 'Oh Why' song was on several platforms, but his YouTube video only has 41,122 views and there's no Grammy nomination...]But back to the matter at hand - having convinced the Court that there was a reasonable possibility that the writers had access to the work, the next question was whether or not the… [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
” The Fifth Circuit ruling (O’Donnell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
Regarding proposed Reg BI, SIFMA recommended that the definition of “retail customer” be harmonized with FINRA’s definition because the definition as proposed would result in inconsistent and redundant compliance structures.SIFMA also urged the SEC to incorporate the “reasonable investor” definition of materiality set forth in Basic v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
Other similarities claimed included: structure of the lyrics between the choruses, tone, harmonic progression, texture, melodic fills, rhythmic clicking. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Chyronhego Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:48 pm
., Sandra Shines v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:53 am
Lightning-v-Harmon-Complaint [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am
As of today, this case arguably represent the most sophisticated and explicit use of EU pre-emption by the Court and – in even more express terms – by AG Wathelet in his Opinion [here].In the present case, should the CJEU decide to follow the Opinion of its AG, this would mean that an approach like the one adopted by the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme (in which copyright was found to subsist in the smell of a perfume) would not be allowed.Is copyright like… [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 2:18 pm
Articles and speech transcripts published in law reviews “Defense Presence and Participation: A Procedural Minimum for Batson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:24 pm
The Commission acknowledges that securities and insolvency laws are not harmonized at the EU level. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:07 am
In US Shale Energy II LLC et al v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:22 am
Chambers V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:53 pm
Court of International Trade in Danze, Inc. v. [read post]
