Search for: "Harris v. Department of State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am
United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, the Texas Supreme Court struck down the state’s licensing requirements for eyebrow threaders. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm
In 2014, the Court rejected Abood and compelled agency fees with respect to private-sector unions in Harris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
SEIU (2012) and Harris v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
By this point, Justice Elena Kagan, who went head-to-head with Alito in the 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:55 am
The decision by the Kentucky Supreme Court last summer and its case, Indiana Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
In enacting the modern INA in 1965, Congress assumed that State Department consular officers all over the world would apply their expertise and judgment to decisions on visa applications. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
New Relists Harris v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck covered Zaidan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
Harris, a North Carolina redistricting decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Edwards, Alexes Harris, Wesley G. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
They also discussed Doe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:39 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., 884 F.3d 560 (6th Cir. 2018). [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
Silberman wrote the majority opinion, which Judge Harry T. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Justice Samuel Alito is up next with Husted v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm
In 2011, however, the Obama Administration had already instructed the Justice Department to stop defending the constitutionality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), leading to the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
