Search for: "High v State"
Results 501 - 520
of 35,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 7:56 am
Ziglar v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:36 pm
Ultimately, however, the state's high court found that would be an unfair burden for the retailer to shoulder. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:31 am
Another California homeowner, this time in Santa Cruz, discovers how hard the state’s law can make it to oust AirBnB guests who overstay [ABC Radio; earlier here (relatives and family members), here (homeless guest), here (nanny), and here (earlier AirBnB)] Tags: California, hotels, landlord tenant lawThey came to stay, V is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
Noel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:19 am
(a firm) v Holden & Anor [2008] EWHC 2731 (Ch) (12 November 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Lynch, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 2697 (Admin) (7 November 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649 (02 July 2009) Walkden v Walkden [2009] EWCA Civ 627 (25 June 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench) C v Dixon [2009] EWHC 708 (QB) (25 June 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Woolf [2009] EWHC B15 (Ch) (19 June 2009) Lindop [...] [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Lediaev v Vallen [2009] EWCA Civ 156 (05 March 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Stanley v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 404 (Admin) (04 March 2009) Von Der Pahlen v Leoben High Court, Austria [2009] EWHC 383 (Admin) (04 March 2009) Capel Parish Council v Surrey County Council [...] [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:26 am
But definitely isn't.Regardless, this is an important -- albeit obscure and limited -- case, and revolves around whether the 11th Amendment bars EEOC actions against a state that allegedly discriminated against high-level state officials. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Supreme Court held that a high school football coach’s post-game ritual of kneeling at midfield to offer a quiet personal prayer was protected by the Free Exercise Clause (as well as the Free Speech Clause). [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
State Bar, City of Montebello v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:32 am
With the United States Supreme Court ruling in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:14 am
The latest in this series of cases is the judgment of the Andhra High Court in Muralidhar Rao v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:10 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a feeJanus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:55 am
In Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Rajesh Batra v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:34 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mauro v Government of the United States of America [2009] EWCA Civ 150 (04 February 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Golden Key Ltd, Re Insolvency Act 1986 [2009] EWHC 148 (Ch) (04 February 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Rastrum Ltd & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2009] EWHC [...] [read post]
