Search for: "High v State"
Results 501 - 520
of 35,296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
Swatch’s claim for trade mark infringement succeeded in the High Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:01 pm
Block Mining, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Texas v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
Coercion Questions from a few of the justices appeared to imply an exceedingly high bar to find state action under a coercion theory. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
Local police officers were patrolling a high crime area late one December night in Norfolk, Virginia, when they noticed a car without a front license plate as required by state law and with only a paper temporary tag on its rear. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
Secretary General, States, and competent U.N. bodies; drawing up a Statute for a permanent international penal tribunal for trying the crime of apartheid as envisaged by Article V of the Convention; and drawing attention to the role of transnational corporations in sustaining apartheid in Southern Africa. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
., Ltd (Oppo) October 19, 2019 Provided a counteroffer of 3.7 million yuan Stated that ACT never provided a calculation method for its offer Advanced Codec Technologies, LLC (ACT) November 6, 2019 ACT proposed a global licensing fee of US$ 17 million Oppo contested that ACT did not elaborate on the calculation method OPPO Guangdong Mobile Communications Co., Ltd (Oppo) November 15, 2019 Oppo said the offer was too high and did not conform to FRAND principles Advanced Codec… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in NRA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
"] From B.B. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See com Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm
Representing the NRA, David Cole of the American Civil Liberties Union characterized the case as a “straightforward” application of the court’s 1963 decision in Bantam Books v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:16 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
United States and Rita v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
To scan the books at high speed, we needed first to free the pages from their binding. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 1993 California case Johnson v. [read post]
