Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes" Results 501 - 520 of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am by Viking
" KIVITV reports that: United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:36 pm by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
In a 1924 profile of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Dorsey Richardson wrote that Holmes came to the bench in 1882, when the transition from individualism to collectivism in England was in progress.... [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:42 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This Response to Professor Deborah Widiss's Texas Law Review article, Undermining Congressional Overrides: The Hydra Problem in Statutory Interpretation, is generally sympathetic to Widiss's concerns but cautions that she may be according Gross v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
— Antonin Scalia (1986) If one would know Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, one must read his memorable speeches, especially his Civil War addresses. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:08 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeTwo months after actress and "Hole" chanteuse Courtney Love agreed to dole out $430,000 to settle a libel claim involving impolitic comments she Tweeted about a fashion designer (Dawn Simorangkir a/k/a Dawn Younger-Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
In the years since Marshall’s 1833 ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:45 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Tuesday, July 31, 2012: Law societies - Aylward v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 4:25 am
The case involveed murder charges against two men, James Faircloth and Paul V. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 8:49 am by Eric Goldman
Trump Courtney Love Defeats Twibel Claims–Holmes v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
(A famous article written by a Catholic law professor connected "Hobbes, Holmes, and Hitler," for example.) [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:41 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Oliver Wendell Holmes once said that “The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious, are what I mean by the law. [read post]