Search for: "Hood v. Hood"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
A recent case that alleged harm under the Federal Tort Claims Act, DUCKWALL-KENNADY v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:39 am
The issues on appeal were: (1) Whether the Court’s decision in Stewart Organization, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
Whichever way high court rules in Hood v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
Wright, 525 F.2d 909 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), aff’d on other grounds, 430 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977)”) In re Schafer, 689 F.3d 601, 604, 606 (6th Cir. 2012) (describing as one of its “precedents” “Hood v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:02 am
v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
Hood v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
John Fund at SCOTUSBlog] Elane Photography files certiorari petition [PDF] seeking review of ruling compelling owner to shoot same-sex partnership celebration [Adam Liptak, NYT, citing Cato brief in New Mexico case below, more on which here] Court hears oral argument on Hood v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm
Hood v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
Hood v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 11:32 am
Hood v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm
In Monday’s argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:19 am
Hood v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm
A simple question, perhaps, but one the Court is poised to decide in Sandifer v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
The hood of the car was raised. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 8:05 am
“Even if he says he had no intention of driving, the accused could have put his vehicle in motion at any time, even if only to verify whether his repairs were working,” ruled Quebec Court Judge Pierre Verdon.Verdon notably referred to a Supreme Court ruling issued almost exactly a year ago to the day.In R. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:09 am
Hood hits Google on guarding intellectual property — Mississippi State Attorney General Jim Hood continues to work on behalf of creators. [read post]
