Search for: "Hooks v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Hooks, et al., No. 1:18-cv-00502 (M.D.N.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
The Circuit has already applied Kingsely to pre-trial detainees who suffer abuse in lockup prior to any conviction, in Darnell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in Timbs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
In Southern Cotton Oil v Anderson, the precedent-setting case from 1920, Florida Supreme Court justices decided that cars were inherently dangerous. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
They chained me to the hooks. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
The doctors wins the case on qualified immunity grounds, yet another technical defense to these claims, which lets government defendants off the hook if they did not violate clearly-established law. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:16 am
Class actions, like state wage and hour laws for example, are generally “opt out” – meaning that employers can be on the hook for people who have never (and otherwise never would have) filed a claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
Notwithstanding Brexit, GDPR (or equivalent provisions) will continue – by hook or by crook – to apply to the UK long after it ceases to be a member of the EU. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
Illum v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:18 pm
Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd (2018) EWCA Civ 1125 The Court of Appeal on an instance of tenancy management going bad, very bad indeed. [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:43 am
Most of the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, which lets public defendants off the hook in damages claims when the law was not clearly-established at the time of the violation. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:30 pm
In addition, given the ascension of right-to-work laws and cases like Janus v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm
See Clifford v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
United States President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, is discontinuing his defamation actions against Fusion GPS and Buzzfeed arising out of the infamous “Steele Dossier” Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has a number of posts including: An analysis of the approval of net neutrality laws in California and considers the practical legislative implications. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:25 pm
On the other hand, the CJEU in Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801 held that an English Court could not apply the doctrine of forum non conveniens to decline jurisdiction over a claim against a European domiciliary on the ground that the natural forum for the claims was outside Europe (albeit the CJEU in that case did not state whether this doctrine applied in cases concerned with the subject matter of Art 24). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm
The CRA states that a rule may not "take effect," until the rule and its proposed effective date have been transmitted to Congress. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
When Congress first started having hearings about child labor and convict made goods, some people suggested that a hook for Congress was unfair competition—producers in other states were at a cost disadvantage to those who were child labor users. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:17 am
: US v. [read post]
