Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 501 - 520
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes note of the lower court’s actions following the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this term in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
., 248 N.Y. 339 (N.Y. 1928) Nominated by Howard Wasserman Seconded by Alan Childress Text of the opinion Wikipedia article In probably the most famous case in torts, and perhaps in all of American legal education, railroad passenger Mrs. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” At Prawfsblawgs, Howard Wasserman argues in favor of a filibuster by Senate Democrats, but notes that “the framing of the strategy is going to be essential” and that “the Democrats need to find their own principle beyond tit-for-tat. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Gorsuch’s dissent emphasized a concern that arose during arguments–that state courts may now have to deal with claims that were untimely by many years,” but explains that “[s]uch timing should not be a significant concern in the mine run of cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes issue with liberal complaints about Republican court-packing. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman recognizes the validity of Goldberg's point (with the caveat that it's nothing new, which of course is true but fails to address the fact that it's not getting any better, and appears to be getting worse). [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Other comments on the argument in Hernández come in two posts at Prawsfblawg from Howard Wasserman, here and here. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional commentary comes from Michael Dorf at his eponymous blog, Robert George in an op-ed for The New York Times, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Jennifer Rubin in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, Jennifer Finney Boylan in an op-ed for The New York Times, Noah Feldman in an op-ed for Bloomberg, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Michael Farris at National Review, Mark Joseph Stern at… [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am
Howard Wasserman raises some questions about the efficacy of online teaching. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
United States, where a defendant was convicted of violating Sarbanes-Oxley’s ‘anti-shredding’ prohibition by throwing illegally caught fish off his boat”; Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who summarizes the case as one in which, “[i]n a nutshell, the Court concludes that the federal prosecutors exceeded the power the statute gave them . . . and thus there is no need to decide whether Congress exceeded the power the Constitution’s treaty and… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
It started at PrawfsBlawg, with lawprof Howard Wasserman free-riding the coattails of Cornell lawprof Mike Dorf, with the Wass-man noting “Mike share [sic] my view that cameras are a good idea but not a panacea. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” Howard Wasserman analyzes both Reed and Walker at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman ponders some process-oriented questions raised by Vance and Mazars and discusses potential implications for future cases. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
[24] Howard M. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm
For details, see Wasserman. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:18 am
In private correspondence, another Florida-based law professor, Howard Wasserman (located hundreds of miles away from Gainesville in South Florida), asked a particularly interesting question about the total number of electors who would be eligible to vote after any successful objections. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman remarks that the court “conclude[ed] yet again that Congress’ power to ‘change the law’ to push pending litigation to its preferred conclusion is, in practice, unbounded. [read post]
