Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 501 - 520
of 599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
At Prawfsblawg, Howard Wasserman parses Omari’s tale of strength in the face of victimhood. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Commentary and analysis come from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg (here and here), Kevin Snider at JURIST, and Fred Woocher at the Election Law Blog, who discusses what the voting alignment suggests about the Justices’ views of the merits of the case. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
Howard Wasserman challenges the assumptive reasons offered by the op-ed, and as noted in the comments by other law profs, the extent to which even the assumptive reasons apply varies greatly from school to school, professor to professor. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that today marks the seventieth anniversary of the death of Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, which left the Court with just seven members. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm
For a more detailed explanation of the procedural obstacles to challenging SB 8, see this excellent article by Charles "Rocky" Rhodes and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
But unlike Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving, whose love story and legal victory in the aptly named case have become iconic cultural references and given birth to a holiday, Palmore did not produce a similar happy ending for Linda Sidoti Palmore and her family.I recently revisited Palmore to write a chapter about it for a forthcoming book, Painting Constitutional Law (edited by Howard Wasserman and M.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
UPDATE: Legal scholar Howard Wasserman comments on this post here: I agree with Ilya that excessive judicial deference is a problem. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that a “better solution might have been that there is a final judgment in the dismissal order, but that there are prudential limits on a court reviewing a voluntary dismissal, just as there are prudential limits on a court taking appeals from the winners below. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “[i]f any case not on all factual fours with Bivens represents a new context, the majority gets where Justice Thomas wants to go, without the political cost of overrulings. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
(See my article with Howard Wasserman, The Process of Marriage Equality). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
’” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes issue with the baseball analogy. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Commentary on the case comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who writes that the Court’s “relatively short and unanimous opinion breaks no new ground”; from Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who predicts that both the Ohio law at issue in the case and other similar laws will “go down in the next few years”; from Lisa Soronen at the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, who observes that the case “should be of more interest… [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am
Howard Wasserman raises some questions about the efficacy of online teaching. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In an excellent analysis of the case for SCOTUSblog, Professor Howard Wasserman noted that repeated instances of laughter interrupted the oral arguments: “Anyone who believes civil procedure is not funny should read the transcript of Tuesday’s argument in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 3:58 am
That’s not really an accurate description nor a realistic concern, as Howard Wasserman explains. [read post]
