Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 501 - 520
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
It started at PrawfsBlawg, with lawprof Howard Wasserman free-riding the coattails of Cornell lawprof Mike Dorf, with the Wass-man noting “Mike share [sic] my view that cameras are a good idea but not a panacea. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
PPS: I'm just now noticing Howard Wasserman's PrawfsBlawg post, which summarizes these two bills and some additional proposals as well (also courtesy of Ed). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional commentary comes from Michael Dorf at his eponymous blog, Robert George in an op-ed for The New York Times, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Jennifer Rubin in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, Jennifer Finney Boylan in an op-ed for The New York Times, Noah Feldman in an op-ed for Bloomberg, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Michael Farris at National Review, Mark Joseph Stern at… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
., 248 N.Y. 339 (N.Y. 1928) Nominated by Howard Wasserman Seconded by Alan Childress Text of the opinion Wikipedia article In probably the most famous case in torts, and perhaps in all of American legal education, railroad passenger Mrs. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Commentary on the case comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who writes that the Court’s “relatively short and unanimous opinion breaks no new ground”; from Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who predicts that both the Ohio law at issue in the case and other similar laws will “go down in the next few years”; from Lisa Soronen at the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, who observes that the case “should be of more interest… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
[24] Howard M. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at one of next week’s cases, Hall v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent from the court’s decision on Monday to deny review of a lower court’s ruling granting qualified immunity on summary judgment to a police officer who was sued for shooting a suspect, observing that the dissent “highlights the Court’s failure to intervene in this and similar cases in which summary judgment is (erroneously) granted against § 1983 plaintiffs, while… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who remarks that “[t]he big difference” from in-person arguments “is that the Justices were less the stars,” Josh Blackman at Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog (via How Appealing), Elie Mystal at The Nation, and the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, which observes that the unprecedented teleconference format offered “a great chance for the public to witness the… [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am
Howard Wasserman raises some questions about the efficacy of online teaching. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm
For details, see Wasserman. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:18 am
In private correspondence, another Florida-based law professor, Howard Wasserman (located hundreds of miles away from Gainesville in South Florida), asked a particularly interesting question about the total number of electors who would be eligible to vote after any successful objections. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg, here and here, and Erica Goldberg at In a Crowded Theater. [read post]
