Search for: "Hudson v. US Government" Results 501 - 520 of 604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Orin Kerr
Similarly, violations of the knock-and-announce rule do not warrant suppression, see Hudson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Federal court papers on a settlement between the government and the Indiana-based company say that Cummins shipped heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers between 1998 and 2006 without including pollution control equipment. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new ruling was based on the Court’s 1992 decision in Hudson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:07 am by Dianne Saxe
  It also goes far beyond municipal bylaws to curb the cosmetic use of pesticides, which were upheld by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
New York, New Jersey and Connecticut joined the federal government and two environmental groups in a 1999 lawsuit over pollution from the Duke plant, the 560-megawatt Gallagher Station, which blows eastward and brings smog and soot to the Adirondacks and other areas. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
New York, New Jersey and Connecticut joined the federal government and two environmental groups in a 1999 lawsuit over pollution from the Duke plant, the 560-megawatt Gallagher Station, which blows eastward and brings smog and soot to the Adirondacks and other areas. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 4:51 pm
"The applicability of the Fourth Amendment turns on whether 'the person invoking its protection can claim a justifiable, a reasonable, or a legitimate expectation of privacy' that has been invaded by government action.'" Hudson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
If there is an existing standard for substantiation developed by a government agency or other authoritative body, we may accord some deference to that standard. [read post]