Search for: "Huff " Results 501 - 520 of 937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2010, 9:46 am by CJLF Staff
  The slain officer, Brian Huff, was a 12-year veteran with a wife and a 10-year-old son. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 2:05 pm by Robert Walch
The proposed bill is authored and sponsored by Republican Senator Bob Huff of San Dimas, California. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:30 am
  In her January 4, 2008 order denying the motion to dismiss, Central District of California Judge Marilyn Huff found that the plaintiffs’ complaint adequately pled that the alleged misrepresentations were false and misleading. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:57 pm by Elizabeth A. Patton
” Judge Huff also held that the summary judgment phase is better suited to determine whether one plaintiff’s mark, “PetConnect Rescue,” is a protectable trademark. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 2:05 pm by Robert Walch
The proposed bill is authored and sponsored by Republican Senator Bob Huff of San Dimas, California. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of reemployment… [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Huff, Repairing Our Foundation Through Christian Scholarship, 29 Regent University Law Review 123-132 (2016-2017).Eric G. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
I went back to my office, not 2 minutes later, the Medical Assistant ran into my office, the patient had left in a huff. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 8:16 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
   Free but registration requestedHighland Park Senior Center220 South 6th Ave.Highland Park, NJ 08904Fee: no cost For additional information, call the Highland Park Office of Aging  732-819-0052Nicole Huff nhuff@hpboro.com https://www.facebook.com/events/2030889920569304/ [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 1:06 pm by David Oscar Markus
”The segment featuring Moore has him talking to a counterterrorism expert who is actually Cohen in disguise, showing off the supposed newest device in Israeli military technology: a pedophile detector.Moore walked off the set in a huff as the device beeped persistently whenever waved around him. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:00 am by Mitra Sharafi
Ronald Huff Buddy Howell displays a dizzying mastery of gangs. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:19 am by Ryan E. Long
In the end, if Oracle's source code is original enough for copyright but not so original so as to read that protection broadly, then Google's fair use big bad wolf will likely huff, puff, and blow over Oracle's copyright lawsuit to the ground. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:17 am
"One friend of mine repeatedly scolded a roommate who refused to stop going to parties or to wash his hands, until the guy moved out in a huff. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
All that said, I'd love to defend him on his recent snafu as this case may present some issues to huff and puff over. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by David DePaolo
The Assembly then followed with a 53-25 vote, with Republicans opposing the measure again.What's funny to me is that Republican leader Bob Huff of Diamond Bar told the Senate, “Colleagues, ask yourself how comfortable you are with a final product produced by three people in a closed room that neither you, nor your constituents have had a chance to review. [read post]