Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 19,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
But in MOC (by his litigation friend, MG)-v-Secretary of State [2022] EWCA an Upper Tribunal Judge found that capacity was unsuitable as a key element in identifying a “status” for Article 14 as too “potentially evanescent”. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:08 am
Article 8 of the ECHR protects the right to respect for family and private life.In Obst v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am
The legal basis: Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the European Convention on Human Rights, the duty on States to hold free and fair elections, has been receiving more than its usual share of attention. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Block v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Block v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
2 May 2010, 12:14 pm
Dept. of Health & Human Services. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
While in terms of international law and standards non-state actors carry a limited range of human rights responsibilities, in light of the use of the pro homine principle in human rights, where a non-state actor is acting on behalf of the State — or performing a state function directly — their obligations are not limited to respecting human rights, but also fulfilling them. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:00 am
Evidence must always be sufficiently clear, convincing and cogent to satisfy the “balance of probabilities” test stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in F.H. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
In Case of Lautsi and Others v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Awuku, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3298 (Admin) - QBD President names and shames 3 solicitors who failed disclosure duties in without notice removal stay applications. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 pm
L. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
– The Human Rights Roundup August 9, 2011 Melina Padron Will the Detainee Inquiry be human rights compliant? [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:08 am
According to that case, Williams v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
This requirement stems, in part, from Diamond v. [read post]
