Search for: "IN RE: B.R." Results 501 - 520 of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
#bankruptcy The Jacksonville, Florida court determined in 100 B.R. 579.pdf that the automatic stay protections extend to protect against not just evictions but damage resulting from those that are done wrongfully. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:48 am by Randall Reese
  The update focuses on decisions in two large cases that addressed the issue:In re Pacific Lumber Co., 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2009) (held that a secured creditor does not always have the right to credit bid its secured claim)In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, 418 B.R. 548 (E.D. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:23 am by Richard
Dec. 11, 2012), held that the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel decision in In re Parks, 475 B.R .703 (9th Cir.BAP 2012), applied only to above-median income debtors who were subject to the bankruptcy code’s “means test. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:04 pm by Brad Sandler
  [NB:  Payment made to insiders that are incentive payments are permitted -- see In re Nellson Nutraceutical, 369 B.R. 787 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm by Michael Smith
One of the leading bankruptcy cases to address the question is In re Ehmann, 319 B.R. 200 (Bankr. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:51 pm
The bankruptcy court had previously issued its decision dated December 19, 2005 in In re Rosacometta, SrL, 336 B.R. 557 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2005)(Mark C.J.). [read post]
The recent decision In re Washington Mutual, Inc. [2] (which was followed even more recently in In re Accuride Corporation [3]) applies the disclosure requirements in Rule 2019 to members of an ad hoc group participating in a Chapter 11 case. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:23 am by Kurt O'Keefe, Attorney at Law
EADER, 426 B.R. 164, (2010) So, at least in most bankruptcy courts, assuming a lease does NOT make you personally liable again on that contract. [read post]