Search for: "IN RE: B.R." Results 501 - 520 of 1,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Christine Wilton
  There still might be a glimmer of hope in California Bankruptcy Courts though with In re Veal, 450 B.R. 897 (9th Cir. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:42 am by Mariah
"In re Schivo, 462 B.R. 765 (Bankr. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
#bankruptcy The Jacksonville, Florida court determined in 100 B.R. 579.pdf that the automatic stay protections extend to protect against not just evictions but damage resulting from those that are done wrongfully. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:45 pm by Mariah
"In re Schivo, 462 B.R. 765 (Bankr. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:26 pm by Asaph Abrams
Billingslea (10-07125-LT13; 454 B.R. 759). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:31 am by Nicholas Gebelt
The authority for this lien stripping is In re Zimmer, 313 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2002), though the vehicle used is usually called a Lam motion after In re Lam, 211 B.R. 36 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1997). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:00 am
Louis area), the court decided this issue in the decision In re Carson, 150 B.R. 228 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A pre-petition injury qualifies as a legal interest, within the meaning of the statute (In re Corbi, 149 B.R. 325,329 [Bankr.E.D.N.Y.l993]) and a debtor is required to disclose in its bankruptcy petition any causes of action that would be brought by the debtor (Kunica v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:10 am
On November 18, 2011, in the matter captioned In re Scotto-DiClemente, 459 B.R. 558, Judge Kaplan held that: (1) the debtor's ability to use Chapter 13 plan to strip off wholly unsecured junior mortgage liens on his principal residence was not contingent upon debtor's receipt of Chapter 13 discharge; and (2) the Chapter 13 case, while filed close on heels of Chapter 7 case in which debtor was granted a dis-charge only six months earlier, was not filed in "bad… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
    The Court cited, among other cases, In re Multicanal, 307 B.R. 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), in which the author was lead counsel. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:14 am by admin
  The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel adopted the reasoning of the 8th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in the case of In re Nelson, 274 B.R. 789 (2002), recognizing that the protections of ERISA extends not only to the employee, but also to the spouse, former spouse, or dependent children, who may also be beneficiaries under the retirement plan. [read post]