Search for: "IN RE: JURY ISSUE"
Results 501 - 520
of 10,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 10:08 am
When you are on trial for a crime in Maryland, there are several things that the court has to decide before the jury decides whether you’re not guilty or guilty. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:23 am
On April 9, a jury found that Microsoft infringed on Lucent/Alcatel touch-screen patents. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
"Wholly apart from the Court of Appeal's expressly laudatory statement about Judge Wiley ("the experienced and highly regarded trial judge"), the Court of Appeal also recognizes that the issue was a complex one and the procedural setting of the dispute far from ideal.In short, if you're a trial judge who's going to get reversed by the Court of Appeal, something like this is probably how you want it to happen. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:02 am
The court of appeals never addressed the issue of jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Mitts (Relisted after the 4/15 and 4/22 Conferences) Docket: 10-1000 Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
The trial court didn't tell the jury anything at all about that legal issue. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:27 am
Are all death row inmates now entitled to re-sentencing hearings. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm
In re ESTATE OF Opal Mae TAPLEYANDREWS, Judge [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:27 pm
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 2012 U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:33 pm
Judge Koh has meanwhile filed her latest jury verdict form (it appears final but minor modifications may still happen) and her final set of jury instructions (she told the parties not to re-raise objections but to comment only on typographical errors).Late on Monday, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss claims without prejudice, but that stipulation is old news: it merely formalizes what the parties previously proposed. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that raises the issue of whether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney–client privilege where obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the significant purposes behind the communication.The case is called In Re Grand Jury. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
Indeed, as I have often remarked to my students, trade secret cases are a trial lawyer’s dream, because you are dealing with the kind of emotional issues that can draw in a jury and make it easy to keep attention focused on the story you’re trying to tell. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:53 pm
The $70 million figure ordered by the jury was based on the 109 million licenses of Office issued by Microsoft during the period of infringement. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 3:00 pm
And if you're particularly lucky, I'll throw in some tips gleaned from my former clients on the mean streets of New York.... [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 8:17 am
Here are some quotes:Marion County judges have been threatening for years to crack down on jury duty no-shows, but this time they're serious. [read post]
High Acquittal Rate for Jury-waived OUI Trials in Massachusetts is Not a Result of Judicial Leniency
31 Oct 2011, 7:40 pm
My supervisor handed me the file and said "Here, take a look at this case, you're trying it tomorrow. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
No doubt, objections to statements of decision, new trial motions, JNOVs and motions for judgment as a matter of law can be useful tools for relief when the trial court simply missed something critical the first time around or a jury clearly blew it.Their most common purpose, however, is preserving issues for appeal. [read post]
25 May 2007, 9:55 am
This issue bears close watching, as it appears it will be a hot button issue in employment law for the foreseeable future.? [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
Generally speaking, misconduct, evidentiary issues, and a hung jury are all grounds for a mistrial. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:22 am
Failure to do so will result in you being removed from the jury, and may require a mistrial, which means the lawyers would be required to re-try the case. [read post]
