Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. B., A CHILD"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 8:20 am
(b) If a conservator of a child requests the court to order periods of electronic communication with the child under this section, the court may award the conservator reasonable periods of electronic communication with the child to supplement the conservator’s periods of possession of the child. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:45 am
The Appellate Division cited Appendix IX-B in stating that income and expenses from self-employment or the operation of a business should be carefully reviewed to determine gross income that is available to the parent to pay a child support obligation. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:34 am
(d) Within the second degree of consanguinity means a relationship in which one individual is another individual's parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, or spouse thereof. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:40 am
B. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
This concerned whether a shared residence order under s.8 Children Act 1989 meant that a child was ‘reasonably expected’ to be resident with both parents following a divorce, for the purposes of s.189(1)(b) Housing Act 1996, so as to confer priority need in a homeless application. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:38 pm
Based upon the finding of neglect of A and B, the Family Court found that C was a derivatively neglected child. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
In 2011, a Texas court entered an “agreed order” appointing Young as Child’s “sole managing conservator” and limiting Hagel to “reasonable supervised visitation,” finding that it would not be in Child’s best interest for Hagel to have “specific periods of possession” of Child. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 4:38 pm
Milijana filed a three count complaint against Jeffrey Brend of Levin and Brend, P.C. for (a) legal malpractice; (b) intentional breach of fiduciary duty; and (c) intentional interference with Milijana's custody rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
A pediatrician who treated the child determined he had Battered Child Syndrome and life-altering brain injuries that would prevent the child from ever living or functioning on his own. [read post]
26 May 2012, 1:44 pm
If the party served with the notice of intended adoption plan is an entity whose consent is required, the notice must specifically state that the entity must file, within 30 days after service, a verified response setting forth a legal basis for contesting the intended adoption plan, specifically addressing the best interests interest of the child. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:21 am
A presumption for joint legal custody may be rebutted by a showing by a preponderance of the evidence that it is not in the best interest of the child. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
The Appellate Division held that the family court’s failure to conduct a hearing or consider the child’s best interests before dismissing the guardianship petition and denying the petitioner’s immigration-related motion was error requiring remittance. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The nonparty Andrell B. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
RC 3107.07 (B)(2)(c) does not specifically require the finding of “care and support” to the mother during her pregnancy as it does for the child under the (B)(2)(b) subsection, and thus should be defined as “forsake entirely…to relinquish all connection with or concern with…” Under such a definition, Father’s attempts to see the child’s Mother, his registration with the putative father… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
Although it is correct in law to say that the 26 week statutory provisions brought in by C&FA 2014 do not apply specifically to placement applications, it is wrong in reality to say that 26 weeks doesn’t apply to placement proceedings. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 5:40 am
C. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:48 pm
Sec. 3142(c)(1)(B)(vii) requires that those indicted on certain crimes must "refrain from possessing a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon" when out on bail. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
The facts are quite unusual, but the following points do seem of general application: (a) local authorities cannot side-step their s.20 duties merely be sending the ‘child’ to another part of the country; (b) however, in each case, the authority will have to be alive to the wishes of the child as to where he or she wishes to be accomodated and, in certain cases, may be able to lawfully conclude that the child should, in fact, be accomodated in… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:21 am
Even courts take actions in the best interest of the child. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 1:05 pm
ICWA provides additional guidance on the best interest of the native child. [read post]
