Search for: "INDIRECT PURCHASERS" Results 501 - 520 of 1,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 3:41 pm by Bill Marler
Salmonellosis is caused by consuming food or water contaminated with Salmonella bacteria, or by direct or indirect contact with fecal matter from infected people or animals. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:55 pm by Josh Fensterbush
Salmonellosis is caused by consuming food or water contaminated with Salmonella bacteria, or by direct or indirect contact with fecal matter from infected people or animals. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:51 am by Charlie Nelson Keever
Apple moved to dismiss, arguing that the iPhone owners lack standing to sue because they are not direct purchasers from Apple under the “Illinois Brick doctrine” established by the Supreme Court in 1977, which determined that indirect consumers of products lack Article III standing to bring antitrust charges against producers of those products. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
In dissent, Justice Neil Gorsuch argued that iPhone owners should be considered to be indirect purchasers and criticized the majority’s ruling as a formalistic construction of the Illinois Brick rule. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Shahid Buttar
Since 1977, courts have deemed suits by indirect purchasers to be outside the bounds of antitrust law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Caligiuri
Apple cited the Illinois Brick case as authority, which held that direct purchasers may sue antitrust violators, but also ruled that indirect purchasers may not sue. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:20 pm by Sasha Volokh
They actually both agree on this score: Kavanaugh says (p. 5) that the statutory text counsels against reading standing narrowly, and that proximate-cause considerations prevent suits by indirect purchasers. [read post]
13 May 2019, 9:53 am by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick, Kavanaugh explained, “established a bright-line rule that authorizes suits by direct purchasers but bars suits by indirect purchasers. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:17 pm by Douglas Schwartz
The real value of the QOF would be in the P3 private business counter-party that performs labor, owns or leases equipment, and purchases supplies – and for these indirect-owned assets to count toward the 90% test that business must be “active” within the QOZ even though throughout the project labor might be performed and equipment and supplies move in and out of the QOZ. [read post]
3 May 2019, 12:00 am
LEGO was able to display goodwill, confusion and dilution all through evidence and test purchases were even made of Lepin products from a UK seller. [read post]
Thus, if a taxpayer receives an equity interest in a QOF for services rendered to the QOF or to a person in which the QOF holds any direct or indirect equity interest, then the interest in the QOF that the taxpayer receives is treated as a separate investment which does not qualify for opportunity zone tax benefits. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:51 pm by Amy Tranckino
Thus, if a taxpayer receives an equity interest in a QOF for services rendered to the QOF or to a person in which the QOF holds any direct or indirect equity interest, then the interest in the QOF that the taxpayer receives is treated as a separate investment which does not qualify for opportunity zone tax benefits. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Direct purchaser plaintiffs (DPPs) alleged that Keurig’s anticompetitive practices caused the DPPs to be overcharged for their purchases of cups or pods used in Keurig’s single-server brewer machines, while indirect purchaser plaintiffs made similar claims.Keurig’s K-Cup Brewer was the first commercially successful Single Serve Brewer. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am by Samuel Bray
., In re DDAVP Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litig., 903 F. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
  Schuchat [23] found that 32 percent of the 165 culture-confirmed listeriosis cases could be attributed to eating food purchased from store delicatessen counters or soft cheeses. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  They had then refused to sell vanadium oxide to other producers of ferrovanadium, as well as dividing up the market among themselves and fixing prices for the purchase and sale of ore, vanadium oxide and ferrovanadium. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  They had then refused to sell vanadium oxide to other producers of ferrovanadium, as well as dividing up the market among themselves and fixing prices for the purchase and sale of ore, vanadium oxide and ferrovanadium. [read post]