Search for: "In Interest of CT"
Results 501 - 520
of 8,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
The test–the first commercial laboratory blood test for concussions–would eliminate the need for CT scans in some cases. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Ct. 1178, 1187, 87 L. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
I was keenly interested in reading this opinion at the outset because it involves a lawsuit against In-N-Out Burgers, which has a fair amount of cachet in the youthful fast food world. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Miglin sought spousal support along with a restraining order (LSM v EJM, [1999] 3 RFL (5th) 106 (ON Sup Ct J) at para 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
The interesting thing about the age numbers is that at some point you see they turn again as juries increasingly blame age for the injuries. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
Not because the Court of Appeal necessarily decides the case the wrong way, but rather because it's a fight between two nonprofit organizations that do public interest work (Breathe Southern California, on the one hand, and the American Lung Association on the other) as to which entity is entitled to various bequests made -- but not yet funded -- during the period in which these two nonprofits were affiliated.You just gotta feel bad that instead of working the dispute out informally,… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:59 am
Ct. at 2614. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
Superior Ct. for Norfolk Cnty., 457 U.S. 596, 603 (1982). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Ct. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:15 am
Ct. 1983) A divorce court (in theory) should deem the property to be non-marital. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
Superior Ct. of California for Riverside Cnty., 478 U.S. 1, 8 (1986). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
In the hurly burly of work and life, I lost touch with the proceedings in Mann, but recently I became aware of interesting gatekeeping rulings, issued in 2021.[4] I was particularly intrigued by the activity of Naomi Oreskes, qua historian, who sought to offer an expert witness opinion in the Mann case. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
We are, of course, aware of the public interest in this case— the controversy around developing People’s Park, the university’s urgent need for student housing, the town-versus-gown conflicts in Berkeley on noise, displacement, and other issues, and the broader public debate about legal obstacles to housing construction. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
The metaverse is brimming with multifaceted, thought-provoking legal issues. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:09 am
Ct. 1998) Because of this enormous contextual flexibility in both investigation and reporting, courts will be eager to appoint a Guardian Ad Litem who understands the context of the family dynamic. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:15 am
Ct. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
We previously covered the cases of Budis v Skoutelas, Short Form Order, Index No. 702060/13 [Sup Ct, Queens County July 16, 2014] and Pappas v 38-40 LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 30329(U) [Sup Ct NY County Feb. 22, 2018], in which the court held that the estate of a deceased LLC member had no standing to assert derivative claims on the LLC’s behalf. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
Ct. 25, 43 L. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
Ct. 1984) While the final say of who gets what does not happen until the end of the divorce case, an Illinois divorce court can order just about anything while the divorce case is pending. [read post]
