Search for: "In Interest of Ep"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2019, 3:11 pm
BackgroundThe patent in issue is EP(UK) 2 269 603 entitled "Treatment of breast tumours with a rapamycin derivative in combination with exemestane". [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 1:53 am
The case concerned the combination product of abacavir and lamivudine for the treatment of HIV, Swiss SPC C00817637/01, based on EP 081 637 B1. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 6:08 am
The post received considerable interest from the artificial intelligence (AI) community (see full discussion here). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
If you’re interested in that topic, definitely take a listen to that as well. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
The applicant (appellant) appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No. 01128655.6, filed on 30 November 2001 and published as EP 1 211 613 A2. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
In the dark winter months of late 2018, this Kat had the pleasure of revisiting her old PhD haunt, UCL's Cruciform Building, to hear the great and good pass comment on Warner Lambert v Actavis. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 2:38 am
However, it seems that none of these chocolates is yet available for purchase (this Kat would be interested to hear otherwise). [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 12:00 am
Often doesn’t have their best interest in mind. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 8:10 am
Click below to listen to the full episode… https://www.makeitlastradio.com/ep-82/ Click below to read the full transcript… Victor J. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:00 am
If you are interested in purchasing any of the Make It Last books, they are all available on Amazon. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:31 pm
This is actually pretty interesting. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
EP claims A and D14 claims B. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
I found it interesting b [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
In Actavis Lord Neuberger ruled that, contrary to Kirin-Amgen v Hoescht ([2004] UKHL 46) a court may rely on the prosecution history to determine the scope of a patent, if this would unambiguously resolve a point or if it would be contrary to the public interest for the contents of the file to be ignored (paragraph 88). [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
Click below to listen to the full episode… https://www.makeitlastradio.com/ep-77 Click below to read the full transcript… Victor Medina: Hey, everybody. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
It’s interesting to me. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
Eryck closed the interesting and thought-provoking session after taking questions from the floor. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:07 pm
However, it is questionable whether there is a political interest from the Member States considering other pressing issues in the EU, the investments made by some Member States in setting up their own international commercial courts, and the interest in maintaining local expertise and keeping interesting cases within the local court system. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 1:00 am
Click below to listen to the full episode… https://www.makeitlastradio.com/ep-73 Click below to read the full transcript… Victor J. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:50 am
Art. 25-28 UPCA define the effects of the “patent”, which term is to comprise both the future EP with unitary effect and the classic EP patent (Art. 2 g UPCA). [read post]
