Search for: "In Interest of Jackson" Results 501 - 520 of 5,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Jackson Jr.; The Untenable Case for Keeping Investors in the Dark (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian Bebchuk, Robert J. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm by Josh Blackman
The story itself emerged in mid-2017, so I think it safe to say that Justices Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson are not likely sources. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm by Gabriel Chin
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson commented, “[E]lements have to be presented to a jury, and they have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am by Minyao Wang
But Hetronic’s position based on a “uniquely broad” definition of commerce did not elicit serious interest from the justices. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Use as a mark: Justice Jackson seemed interested in an intuitive concept of use as a trademark, but most lower court cases (with the partial exception of the 6th Circuit) don’t accept that as a question different from whether confusion is likely: They reason that, if confusion is likely, then there is use as a trademark. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
On balance, the Tenth Circuit concluded that Hetronic had presented evidence of impacts within the United States of a sufficient character and magnitude as would give the United States a reasonably strong interest in the litigation. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
On balance, the Tenth Circuit concluded that Hetronic had presented evidence of impacts within the United States of a sufficient character and magnitude as would give the United States a reasonably strong interest in the litigation. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Mark MacCarthy
  Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, for instance, seemed to be channeling an amicus brief filed by law scholars Mary Anne Franks and Danielle Citron on behalf of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative: Throughout the argument, Jackson questioned how a statute aimed at providing liability relief for companies that go out of their way to remove harmful and illegal material should somehow come to mean that internet companies are fully protected from liability when they actively promote… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:09 pm by Aimee Guthat
If you have questions about the new premium processing, Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
” Still, Jackson told me in a Lawfare Podcast conversation that he understood the reasoning behind the committee’s choices: I am not a decision maker in the ultimate findings of Congress. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:57 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Erin Camp 1:39 Hi, I’m Erin Camp, a corporate finance lawyer with Jackson Walker. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
It will be interesting to see whether Justice Jackson makes this a cause of hers going forward. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm by Michael Froomkin
Jackson “Rip” Holmes seems to run for the Coral Gables Commission as a regular hobby. [read post]