Search for: "In Re: B "
Results 501 - 520
of 30,126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
On February 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re Messer, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-510. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:31 am
September 2009 hatte der EDÃ-B in einer Empfehlung Google aufgefordert, verschiedene Massnahmen zum besseren Schutz der Personendaten und der Privatsphäre im Online-Dienst Street View umzusetzen. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
We're spreading out the deduction because it's more accurate. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm
Therefore, if nonconsensual re-identification attacks on PGP participants are ethically problematic, then much other nonconsensual re-identification work is likely to be as well. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:23 am
spend the few bucks to incorporate, observe the corporate formalities, and perhaps, if you're very, very good boys and girls, an expensive problem may be avoided. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:04 am
In the Matter of Nnamdi B. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:44 pm
If convicted as a MISDEMEANOR, punishment could include: (1) Up to 1 year jail (2) Up to $2,000 in fines (3) A 10 year prohibition on firearm ownership / possession pursuant to PC 29805 (4) Confiscation/destruction of the weapon (5) Criminal Protective Order (Restraining Order) (6) Up to 5 years of Summary (informal) probation (7) Participation in a Batterers Program (8) Restitution You’ll need an experienced PC 243(b) battery on a peace officer / medical personnel attorney In… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:36 am
The PTO may also be willing to re-calculate the PTA for patents issued more than 180 days ago. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 9:40 am
And just like when we’re at our real homes, we want to feel — and actually be — safe and secure when we’re at these temporary residences. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
See In re Toyota Motor Corp. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 3:35 pm
In re Miller, --- B.R. ----, 2010 WL 5184798 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.2010) Assume Husband "A" and "B" are both recent widowers. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:18 pm
While interesting, the following three recent decision don’t seem to warrant extended analysis, so here are the TV Guide summaries:2d Circuit Throws Out Architectural Copyright Claim on 12(b)(6) Motion Based on Designs Appended to ComplaintDon’t plead yourself out of court. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
"2(b) or not 2(b)? [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:42 pm
Not only do many businesses get a tax increase, but they won’t even know how big of a tax increase they’re facing until well after the bill is adopted. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:47 pm
Appellate court slip opinions: In re Isabella Q. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:00 pm
These are covered in California Family Code Section 297(b). 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:35 am
"Stub rent" is administrative expense here, section 365(d)(3) does not supplant section 503(b). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Olson Revisited," a program of the Historical Society for the District of Columbia Circuit, including a re-enactment of the argument by by Theodore B. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:40 pm
Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a King’s Daughters Medical Center Affirmed summary judgment in favor of hospital finding the res ipsa loquitur doctrine did not apply and eliminating the need for an expert witness to testify as to the failure of bed […] [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:44 pm
CAR DEDUCTIONS ALLOWED EVEN THOUGH NO LIEN In re Thomas, Case No 06-21108 In re Camacho, Case No. 06-20729 October 2007, Judge Berger UST Motion To Dismiss under 707(b) for presumed abuse based upon totality of circumstances was denied. [read post]
