Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Proceedings" Results 501 - 520 of 645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Jets Vacuum (EPLAW) Tribunale de Grande Instance (Paris) exclusive jurisdiction for patent actions brought in France (EPLAW) Abode to go? [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:25 pm
RT @Gawker: Watch the Macy's 4th of July Fireworks Grand Finale http://gawker.com/5817984/ Excellent interview by David Lat of Jeh Johnson, ex-Paul Weiss partner, & now General Counsel of the Defense Department. http://t.co/vEKbyUX The future of jury trials? [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:22 pm
A federal grand jury in Cedar Rapids is hearing evidence about Agriprocessors. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant factually admitted he sold narcotics, and that guilty plea remains part of the overall record in this case, The evidence before the Court, and presumably the grand jury, shows that after working with an accomplice under the age of sixteen, defendant accepted "pre-recorded buy money" from a police officer posing as a customer, and then personally handed narcotics to that officer. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by Barry Barnett
  The MDL process creates more uncertainty due to the weight the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation[3] gives to parties’ preferences; individual judges’ case loads, experience, and willingness to take on extra work; the locations of grand juries; and other factors that don’t often figure into regular motions to transfer venue. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am by MBettman
In fact, juveniles who are bound over to adult court get greater due process protections than juveniles who aren’t, such as grand jury consideration, bail, jury trial, and greater speedy trial rights. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Ted Folkman
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maryland is a back end test about where a Court is able to assess with 20/20 hindsight about what is favorable to a defendant and whether or not it had an effect on the proceedings. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
Secretary State for Justice, seeks to assuage businesses that the parameters of the Act are not intended to prohibit reasonable client development activities: "Rest assured, -- no one wants to stop firms getting to know their clients by taking them to events like Wimbledon or the Grand Prix. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by Susan Brenner
On April 6, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted Sawyer “on one count of receipt and distribution of images of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:55 am by Albert W. Alschuler
A federal grand jury convened by the Justice Department should investigate Trump’s conduct as well. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
The judge rejected that argument, writing that sovereign immunity applies to civil litigation and “there is nothing about this special grand jury that involves or implicates civil practice. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:38 am by Albert W. Alschuler
Just Security’s 37-page compilation of evidence bearing on Trump’s criminality focuses on the two federal crimes a judge already has found that he is likely to have committed (conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding) and the principal state crime now under investigation by a special grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia (solicitation of election fraud). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
Therefore, I don't believe they're true threats or implied threats.State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Sanchez-Badillo, No. 051800, 052045, 052047 Convictions and sentences for conspiring to distribute heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, and marijuana are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) jury's conspiracy verdict was not supported by evidence; 2) trial court made sentencing errors; 3) evidence was insufficient to support jury's verdict against one of the defendants on weapons charges and prosecutorial misconduct entitles him to a new trial; and 4) trial judge made… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
”  After all, the Department of Justice and the grand jury have charged hundreds of individuals in connection with the January 6 attack on the Capitol—some even with “seditious conspiracy” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
  The decisionmakers are really the grand jury, the judge, and the trial jury. [read post]