Search for: "In Re Interest of SAS"
Results 501 - 520
of 984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Not if they’re funding cases like this. 2. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:08 am
The authors therefore conclude that “although the VITA IP policy is an attractive one, the policy of IEEE-SA is even preferable”, because it maximises both licensor and consumer benefits. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
Photo courtesy of Laoshu huahua.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 137 [week ending on Sunday 26 February] | Patents and the Silicon Valley of clothespins | Interested in EU copyright and wish to discuss it in Florence? [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) : À la lumière de R. c. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
Photo courtesy of Laoshu huahua.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 137 [week ending on Sunday 26 February] | Patents and the Silicon Valley of clothespins | Interested in EU copyright and wish to discuss it in Florence? [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:40 am
We are interested in receiving articles that are explicitly informed by Razack’s methodology or any other important aspect of her work.Submissions should be no more than 35 pages (10,000 words) and should conform to the Style Guide available on our website: http://bit.ly/cjwlsubmit. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:40 am
We are interested in receiving articles that are explicitly informed by Razack’s methodology or any other important aspect of her work.Submissions should be no more than 35 pages (10,000 words) and should conform to the Style Guide available on our website: http://bit.ly/cjwlsubmit. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 12:15 pm
Image: Ragesoss / CC BY-SA 3.0 Share this: Join EFF [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Macabeo, S221852).Dans sa décision P. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tax & Tax-Related Orgs (Twitter list): (12) @ABATaxSection – ABA Tax Section – The ABA Section of Taxation (13) @AICPA – AICPA – We’re the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 12, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Breitling SA, Serial No. 879152818 [section 2(d) refusal of MERLIN for "timepieces and chronometric instruments" in view of the identical mark registered for various articles of clothing].January 17, 2017, 2016 - 11 AM: Patriot National Insurance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
