Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 501 - 520
of 12,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 4:14 pm
This argument was rejected on the basis of Mr Justice Meredith’s observations in a 1949 decision of the Patna High Court, which are as follows: The decision in a rent suit is not res judicata on the question of title unless the question of title had to be decided, was expressly raised, and was expressly decided between the parties and in each case it is necessary to examine carefully the decision in the rent suit before any opinion can be formed as to whether it… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:24 am
This is the fifth of the Family Justice Narratives. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:43 am
According to the Independent news service, Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, held private talks last week with concerned MPs regarding the provision of assistance to victims of asbestos-related health conditions. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:49 pm
You know, you're reading briefs, and you're thinking through cases, and you're writing opinions. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
We’re applying the law. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Now that we're a few days removed from the decision, I am even more convinced that Justice Thomas' concurring opinion in Carhart II is the most important, most cryptic, and most interesting opinion in the case. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
At which point I read Justice Werdegar's opinion in another death penalty case -- In Re Lawley -- and noticed that it thrice recounts this word (on pages three and four) as "[m_________r]". [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:30 pm
In the end, the problem the government faces is finding a majority of justices willing to walk away from a unanimous opinion from Justice Amy Coney Barrett that rejected a similar argument by the government less than a year ago. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for the unanimous Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
But the three concise paragraphs comprising proposed new Rule 15(b) -- titled "Tentative Opinions" -- constitute what Division Two Presiding Justice Anthony Kline describes as a "major transformation," and culminate decades of debate on an uncommon appellate procedure: the issuance of draft opinions in advance of oral argument.The proposed rule would allow appellate panels, "on occasion and in their sole discretion, to issue tentative… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:56 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
But a concurring opinion by Judge Richard Clifton argued that the court’s approach conflicts with the re-entry statute and undermines finality interests. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
Judge Marra’s Opinion Judge Marra’s opinion is worth a very close read because he basically gives the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:47 pm
Maybe I'm just punch drunk after a long day's work, but I found this opinion inexplicably funny. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
"It seems to me, again, that Justice Doyle must have meant "dissented". [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 1:45 pm
Roberts struck back at critics of “unelected politicians in robes” by smugly pointing out that judges “typically speak only through their decisions” a callback to Justice Coney Barrett’s admonishing that critics need to “read the opinion. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:20 pm
I think this is another case that we can mark down as a likely candidate for a relatively prompt opinion. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:12 pm
Related posts:Recognition and Res Judicata of US Class Action Judgments in European Legal Systems German Federal Court of Justice Rules on International Jurisdiction under Articles 15, 16 and 22 of the Brussels I-Regulation ECJ Rules on Jurisdiction over Defendants whose Domicile is Unknown [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
” Justice Stevens wrote an opinion respecting the denial of certiorari, writing that: While I continue to believe that Almendarez-Torres was wrongly decided, that is not a sufficient reason for revisiting the issue. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
True, we’re still expecting opinions in twenty-three cases, and some of them are likely to divide the Justices heatedly; that always happens towards the end of the Term, probably because the opinions take longer to write (as the Justices are likely trying to resolve their disagreements or writing separately). [read post]
